ClaudeLab

Use case · Professional services

Tenders in professional services

In professional services, tenders are framework agreements and concept awards: what is asked for is not a price but an approach, references and evidence. The effort of taking part is considerable, the hit rate low - and neither is known in advance.

Highest value per individual case

What is different here

What it actually turns on in professional services.

01

Evaluation follows weighted criteria

Price is often only half. Concept, references, the qualification of the team and reliability on dates are weighted - and that weighting is in the documents but is rarely read out beforehand.

02

References have to fit, not impress

What is usually required is comparable projects within a given period and of a given size. Whoever cannot evidence that is excluded, however good the remaining references are.

03

Formal errors beat substance

A missing declaration, the wrong form, an unsigned annex. A formally incomplete bid is not evaluated - regardless of how good the concept was.

Systems we connect here

  • Tender platforms
  • CRM
  • Reference database
  • Document filing

If yours is not listed, that is not an exclusion. Where no interface exists, we build one - that is the most demanding part and it is our trade.

The rule that only applies here

In professional services the formalities decide participation and the concept decides the award. The pre-selection therefore has to check both.

The process

Where a person is needed - and where they no longer are.

  1. ClaudeLab from here

    Step 01Person

    Documents

    Intake

  2. Step 02ClaudeLab

    Review

    Checking

  3. Step 03ClaudeLab

    Matching

    Deciding

The difference

The same process, once as it is today and once with us.

Step 01 · today

The documents arrive as a PDF bundle, sometimes with hundreds of items.

Step 01 · with us

The bundle is read out in full, even at hundreds of items.

Step 02 · today

Someone skims them and decides whether costing is worth it.

Step 02 · with us

The item list is held against your range of services, with exclusion and eligibility criteria alongside.

Step 03 · today

If it is costed, items are matched by hand against your own range of services.

Step 03 · with us

You get an assessment with reasons and decide whether to take part.

What we build

Component 01
The bill of quantities is broken into items and held against your range of services.
Component 02
Exclusion and eligibility criteria are pulled out and checked.
Component 03
The result is an assessment with reasons, not a yes-no traffic light.

Degree of autonomy

The evaluation runs independently; the decision to take part is made by a person. A tender wrongly dropped is never seen again.

Where it does not fit

Where an award turns on references and relationships, an evaluation helps little - there it is not the document that decides.

Frequently asked

Is this worth it in professional services?

In professional services the formalities decide participation and the concept decides the award. The pre-selection therefore has to check both. Whether it pays for you depends on your volume - the audit establishes that.

We use a different system from the ones listed. Does it still work?

Yes. The ones listed are those we most often meet in professional services - a list, not a precondition. Where no interface exists, we build one.

What do we have to provide?

Your range of services in structured form - a list is enough, it only has to be complete. Ten to twenty past tenders together with the decision you took at the time. A contact in costing for the questions of the first weeks. Nothing more is needed to start.

How will we know it works?

Across 20 real tenders the "cost it / drop it" recommendation agrees with yours in at least 85 %. The item list is read out in full - verified by spot check against the PDF. No bid is submitted without a person looking at it.

How long does implementation take?

5 to 8 weeks - the most demanding of the eight cases.

Does the AI decide on its own?

The evaluation runs independently; the decision to take part is made by a person. A tender wrongly dropped is never seen again.

When is this not worth it?

Where an award turns on references and relationships, an evaluation helps little - there it is not the document that decides.

The same process, in general

This page shows the fit in professional services. The process itself is sector-independent - what matters is whether it repeats.

Tenders in general

Tell us where your time goes.

In the audit we record the process, work out what is worth automating, and you get a plan with fixed prices - credited against the build if you go ahead.