Use case
Tenders
Reviewing tenders is expensive, and most of them lead nowhere. Which is exactly why the pre-selection is worth more than the costing itself.
Highest value per individual case
The process
Where a person is needed - and where they no longer are.
- ClaudeLab from here
Step 01Person
Documents
Intake
Step 02ClaudeLab
Review
Checking
Step 03ClaudeLab
Matching
Deciding
The difference
The same process, once as it is today and once with us.
Step 01 · today
Step 01 · with us
Step 02 · today
Step 02 · with us
Step 03 · today
Step 03 · with us
What we build
- Component 01
- The bill of quantities is broken into items and held against your range of services.
- Component 02
- Exclusion and eligibility criteria are pulled out and checked.
- Component 03
- The result is an assessment with reasons, not a yes-no traffic light.
Degree of autonomy
The evaluation runs independently; the decision to take part is made by a person. A tender wrongly dropped is never seen again.
Where it does not fit
Where an award turns on references and relationships, an evaluation helps little - there it is not the document that decides.
More specific
What this looks like in your sector
The process is sector-independent, the fit is not. These pages show the systems, the formats and the rules that actually apply there.
Construction & building services
In public procurement, the pre-selection decides the return, not the costing. Every hour spent on a tender you were going to lose anyway is missing from the one you could have won.
ViewMechanical engineering
In mechanical engineering the exclusion criterion sits in running text, not in a line item. Skim the document and you find it reliably too late.
ViewProfessional services
In professional services the formalities decide participation and the concept decides the award. The pre-selection therefore has to check both.
ViewFrequently asked
What does it cost to automate tenders?
From €6,900 for the first process, from €4,900 for each further one in the same project. The firm price follows the audit (€2,500, credited against the project) - before that, any number would be a guess.
How long does implementation take?
5 to 8 weeks - the most demanding of the eight cases. Building it is usually the shorter half - the time goes into access, coordination and test cases.
What do we have to provide?
Your range of services in structured form - a list is enough, it only has to be complete. Ten to twenty past tenders together with the decision you took at the time. A contact in costing for the questions of the first weeks. Nothing more is needed to start.
How will we know it works?
From verifiable criteria agreed before the build: Across 20 real tenders the "cost it / drop it" recommendation agrees with yours in at least 85 %. The item list is read out in full - verified by spot check against the PDF. No bid is submitted without a person looking at it.
Does the AI decide on its own?
The evaluation runs independently; the decision to take part is made by a person. A tender wrongly dropped is never seen again.
When is this not worth it?
Where an award turns on references and relationships, an evaluation helps little - there it is not the document that decides.
Which sectors does this suit?
In our experience particularly Construction & building services, Mechanical engineering, Professional services. The process itself is sector-independent, though - what matters is whether it repeats.
Tell us where your time goes.
In the audit we record the process, work out what is worth automating, and you get a plan with fixed prices - credited against the build if you go ahead.