Use case
System integration
Many companies do not need AI first, they need a connection. When two systems do not talk to each other, a person does it - every day, by hand.
Usually the cheapest way in
The process
Where a person is needed - and where they no longer are.
Step 01ClaudeLab
Source
Intake
Step 02ClaudeLab
Transfer
Gathering
Step 03ClaudeLab
Target system
Output
The difference
The same process, once as it is today and once with us.
Step 01 · today
Step 01 · with us
Step 02 · today
Step 02 · with us
Step 03 · today
Step 03 · with us
What we build
- Component 01
- A connection between the systems involved - ERP, inventory management, shop, CRM.
- Component 02
- Where no interface exists, we build one. That is our trade.
- Component 03
- Logging, so that an error surfaces before the customer reports it.
Degree of autonomy
Runs entirely independently - there is nothing to decide here, only to transfer. Which is exactly why it is often the best first process.
Where it does not fit
With legacy systems that offer no export at all it gets laborious. Impossible is rare, but it can eat up the benefit.
More specific
What this looks like in your sector
The process is sector-independent, the fit is not. These pages show the systems, the formats and the rules that actually apply there.
Wholesale
In trade a connection is not a convenience but stock control. Every hour of delay is an oversell that costs money and rating.
ViewRetail
In retail the connection is the precondition for stock being right at all. Everything else is built on top of it.
ViewIndustrial suppliers
At a supplier the customer dictates the interface. The connection is therefore not an internal decision but a condition of supply.
ViewFrequently asked
What does it cost to automate system integration?
From €6,900 for the first process, from €4,900 for each further one in the same project. The firm price follows the audit (€2,500, credited against the project) - before that, any number would be a guess.
How long does implementation take?
2 to 4 weeks, usually the cheapest way in. Building it is usually the shorter half - the time goes into access, coordination and test cases.
What do we have to provide?
Access to both sides, source and target - read access is enough for testing. A decision on which system is right in case of doubt. A test tenant or a copy we may work in without touching live data. Nothing more is needed to start.
How will we know it works?
From verifiable criteria agreed before the build: Over a week of parallel operation, source and target agree on 100 % of the records transferred. Every error is reported instead of being silently skipped. An abort mid-transfer leaves no half-written record behind.
Does the AI decide on its own?
Runs entirely independently - there is nothing to decide here, only to transfer. Which is exactly why it is often the best first process.
When is this not worth it?
With legacy systems that offer no export at all it gets laborious. Impossible is rare, but it can eat up the benefit.
Which sectors does this suit?
In our experience particularly Wholesale, Retail, Industrial suppliers. The process itself is sector-independent, though - what matters is whether it repeats.
Tell us where your time goes.
In the audit we record the process, work out what is worth automating, and you get a plan with fixed prices - credited against the build if you go ahead.